Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics
Aktualnye problemi filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS
ISSN 2079-6021(Print)
ISBN 2619-029X(Online)

Current Issues


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2023-3-172-182

Pragmatic Architectonics of Stand-Up Comedy: Actor’s Image, Addressee’s Factor, Interactivity

Authors: Murugova E.V., Verbovataya Yu.V.



Abstract: Stand-up comedy is interpreted in the study as a discourse pattern, perfect for the “cynical” opposition of all aspects of real eventfulness. Fixing the relevant areas of implicit (usually socially labeled) knowledge, not always covered by traditional institutional sources, bringing this knowledge to the target audience are important discourse functions performed by comedians in their appropriate roles. It is established that the actor puts on the mask of an ordinary representative of society, against the background of a comic distortion of reality, he voices “marginal” metaphorical meanings that form the current everyday routine, expressing anger and despair about vicious and weak manifestations inherent in human nature. The comedy genre allows performers to demonstrate a personal view of the world order, to realize their place in the world around them. It is concluded that these possibilities become the central element of the identity of the actor-comedian, determine the parameters of who he objectively is, fix his finding between the internal state and the external manner of behavior that can be recognized by the audience. The comedian is like a creative “persona”, a psychological entity with special characteristics that can be publicly noticed, recognized and used by representatives of a certain culture as a whole. The scenarios generated by the comedian are investigated, which can be traditional or situational (specific to the current communication environment). Their switching in the actor’s discourse determines the nature of the relationship with the audience from complete collusion to confrontation with it.The humorous potential of the actor’s judgments programs a sudden cognitive shift in the audience’s consciousness, which is generated by the discrepancy between perceived meanings and generally accepted mental models of explication of meanings from linguistic units, the effect of deceived expectations. The viewer experiences an unexpected change of psychological state due to spontaneous changes in the interpretation of individual words, phrases or the actor’s narrative as a whole. At the same time, the actor’s jokes do not always correspond to the comedy genre, as a rule, they acquire a deeply tragic content.

Keywords: stand-up comedy, humorous effect, monologue, dialogue, addressee factor, phatic contact, heckler.

For citation: Murugova EV, Verbovataya YuV. Pragmatic Architectonics of Stand-Up Comedy: Actor’s Image, Addressee’s Factor, Interactivity. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2023, no 3, pp. 172–182. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2023-3-172-182 (In Russ.).

Bionote:
* Elena V. Murugova1, Yulia V. Verbovataya2
1, 2Don State Technical University; 
1 Gagarin Square, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344003;
1ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0781-9767; 2ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5456-1362;
1Web of Science Researcher ID: FBW-9717-2022;
1Scopus Author ID: 57202187969;
*e-mail: verbovataya.yuliasick@yandex.ru

Download issue

References:
1. Ivanova SA, Veldina NG. Features of the formation of the pragmatic potential of performances in the genre of «stand-up comedy» (based on the material of the English language). Philology. Theory & Practice. 2020; 13, 3: 141-144. https://doi.org/ 10.30853/filnauki.2020.3.30. (In Russ.).
2. Domansky YV. The subject in the artistic worlds of the current trends of auditory literature: stand-up and rap. Bulletin of the Russian State University. Series: History. Philology. Cultural studies. Oriental studies. 2018; 2-2 (35): 302-312. https://doi.org/ 10.28995/2073-6355-2018-2-302-312. (In Russ.).
3. Olah AR, Junkin JS, Ford TE, Pressler S. Comedy bootcamp: stand-up comedy as humor training for military populations. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research. 2022; 35 (4): 587-616. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/humor-2022-0007.
4. Dubrovskaya PD, Manerova KV. Linguoculturological analysis of the mechanisms of creating humor in the genre of «stand-up» (based on the material of Russian and German languages). Theoretical and applied linguistics. 2019; 5, 4: 62-74. https://doi.org/10.22250/2410­7190_2019_5_4_62_74. (In Russ.).
5. Manzhelevskaya EV. Pragmatic features of the speech of comedians performing in the genre of «stand-up» (based on the material of the English language). Philology. Theory & Practice. 2017; 10, 2 (76): 107-111. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ pragmaticheskie-osobennosti-rechi-komikov-vystupayuschih-v-zhanre-stendap-na-materiale-angliyskogo-yazyka?ysclid=llwacu39yc152499327. Accessed May 21, 2023. (In Russ.).
6. Vigouroux CB. Genre, heteroglossic performances, and new identity; stand-up comedy in modern French society. Language in Society. 2015; 44: 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000068.
7. Aslanova AA, Prokhorova AP. Contrast of scripts as a way of constructing a humorous effect in a short story. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022; 90, 1: 33-40. https://doi.org/ 10.18522/2070-1403-2022-90-1-33-40. (In Russ.).
8. Stepanova AV, Kalmykova EV. Structural and linguistic features of stand-up. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2021; 5-1: 111-115. https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2021-5-1-111-11. (In Russ.).
9. Smith DR. Stand-up comedy and the comedic cult of the individual: or, the humor of James Acaster. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. 2021; 9, 1: 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00082-x.
10. Kozlova EA, Kolesnikova OI. Stand-up comedy as a media medium of self-realization of a strong discursive personality. Questions of Cognitive Linguistics. 2023; 1: 51-61. https://doi.org/ 10.21638/spbu09.2021.205. (In Russ.).
11. Yavits II. Volume and duration as indicators of the success of stand-up performances (based on the experimental analysis of video). Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities. 2017; 5 (776): 116-134. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gromkost-i-dlitelnost-kak-pokazateli-uspeshnosti-stendap-vystuplen.... Accessed May 21, 2023. (In Russ.).
12. Lindfors A. Cultivating participation and the varieties of reflexivity in stand-up comedy. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 2019; 29, 3: 276-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12223.
13. Reilly P. No laughter among thieves: authenticity and the enforcement of community norms in stand-up comedy. American Sociological Review. 2018; 83, 5: 933-958. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0003122418791174.
14. Tomsett E. Positives and negatives: reclaiming the female body and self-deprecation in stand-up comedy. Comedy Studies. 2018; 9, 1: 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2040610X.2018.1437167.
15. Borgella AM, Howard S, Maddox KB. Cracking wise to break the ice: the potential for racial humor to ease interracial anxiety. Humor. 2018; 33, 1: 78-92. Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/ document/doi/10.1515/humor-2018-0133/html. Accessed May 21, 2023.
16. Karasik VI. Algorithms for constructing comic texts. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Linguistics. 2018; 22, 4: 895-918. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-4-895-918. (In Russ.).
17. Bochkarev AI. Emotional reaction of the audience as a way of evaluating the comic and value statuses of various phenomena. Questions of psycholinguistics. 2023; 1 (55): 24-35. https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2023-55-1-24-35. (In Russ.).
18. Kusaeva EE, Tameryan TY. Private detective from classics to modernity: a linguocultural essay: monograph / E.E. Kusaeva, T.Y. Tamerian. Vladikavkaz: LLC NPKP «Mavr»; 2020. Available at: https:// online.bookchamber.ru/book/ru/new?book=2709762. Accessed May 21, 2023. (In Russ.).
19. Tameryan TY. Cultural differences as a cause of communicative failures. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevsky. 2010; 4-2: 739-741. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnye-razlichiya-kak-prichina-kommunikativnyh-neudach/viewer. Accessed May 21, 2023. (In Russ.).
20. Kachmazova AU, Tameryan TY. Cognitive mechanisms of ethnostereotypization of «own» and «strangers». Political linguistics. 2014; 4 (50): 298-305. Available at: http://elar.uspu.ru/bitstream/ uspu/2144/1/plin-2014-04-42.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2023. (In Russ.). 


Количество показов: 236

Возврат к списку

ISSN 2079-6021 (Print)
ISBN 2619-029X (Online)